<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good Idea Or Am I Getting Lazy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aquaristsonline.com/blog/general/good-idea-or-am-i-getting-lazy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aquaristsonline.com/blog/general/good-idea-or-am-i-getting-lazy/</link>
	<description>Information And Resources For Anyone Interested In Aquarium Fish, Saltwater Aquariums, Tropical Fish, Home Aquariums. Aquarium Care, Aquarium Equipment And Much More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 11:21:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.aquaristsonline.com/blog/general/good-idea-or-am-i-getting-lazy/comment-page-1/#comment-24041</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 18:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aquaristsonline.com/?p=1123#comment-24041</guid>
		<description>Stability is a priority for the marine aquarium - very true.

I did check the situation when I started considering automation. An SG check was done just before the manual top-up and a little  after on three occasions. There wasn&#039;t a detectable difference, probably because the amount of water required to correct the seawater level is so small. A detectable difference - or as said a large aquarium - and automation would be on the agenda.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Johns last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AquaristsOnline/~3/506505024/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A Good Reference For Automatic Calculations&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stability is a priority for the marine aquarium &#8211; very true.</p>
<p>I did check the situation when I started considering automation. An SG check was done just before the manual top-up and a little  after on three occasions. There wasn&#8217;t a detectable difference, probably because the amount of water required to correct the seawater level is so small. A detectable difference &#8211; or as said a large aquarium &#8211; and automation would be on the agenda.</p>
<p><abbr><em>Johns last blog post..<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AquaristsOnline/~3/506505024/" rel="nofollow">A Good Reference For Automatic Calculations</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dogs</title>
		<link>http://www.aquaristsonline.com/blog/general/good-idea-or-am-i-getting-lazy/comment-page-1/#comment-24039</link>
		<dc:creator>Dogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aquaristsonline.com/?p=1123#comment-24039</guid>
		<description>Audimating any task that will save you time and energy is not laziness in my opinion

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Dogss last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dogflu.ca/08232006/21/dog_breed_of_the_week&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Dog Breed Of The Week&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Audimating any task that will save you time and energy is not laziness in my opinion</p>
<p><abbr><em>Dogss last blog post..<a href="http://www.dogflu.ca/08232006/21/dog_breed_of_the_week" rel="nofollow">Dog Breed Of The Week</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.aquaristsonline.com/blog/general/good-idea-or-am-i-getting-lazy/comment-page-1/#comment-24038</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aquaristsonline.com/?p=1123#comment-24038</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say the true benefit of an auto-topoff is for keeping salinity as stable as possible.  When you wait to top off all at once, the tank undergoes more of a change than if continuously topped off throughout the day.  I wouldn&#039;t say you&#039;re being lazy but you might be missing the point of an auto-topoff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say the true benefit of an auto-topoff is for keeping salinity as stable as possible.  When you wait to top off all at once, the tank undergoes more of a change than if continuously topped off throughout the day.  I wouldn&#8217;t say you&#8217;re being lazy but you might be missing the point of an auto-topoff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffry r. johnston</title>
		<link>http://www.aquaristsonline.com/blog/general/good-idea-or-am-i-getting-lazy/comment-page-1/#comment-24036</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffry r. johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aquaristsonline.com/?p=1123#comment-24036</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t sound lazy to me. ;-) You&#039;re still going the manual route, aren&#039;t ya?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t sound lazy to me. <img src='http://www.aquaristsonline.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  You&#8217;re still going the manual route, aren&#8217;t ya?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

