So It’s All Prepared, Now For Some Stock

It’s taken quite a while and there have been quite a lot of decisions to make. Before those decisions could be made research has been needed which probably meant the purchase of a good hobby book which in turn threw up a lot of questions. Thank goodness for the internet, a massive resource for information.

The decision on whether it will be a reef or fish only system has been made as well – of course it has, how else would the decisions on some of the equipment be made such as lights? So there the aquarium sits, full of seawater, all equipment running. The biological filter has been started and tests indicate all is ready. Seawater testing must continue through the stocking period and beyond of course. The new aquarist is nearly overcome by the desire to obtain livestock. Hold on a little longer though, the whole point of the system is to see healthy marine life so let’s not make a mistake with it.

Correct stocking means slow stocking with the correct species and this has to include consideration for further stocking later which means the first fish need to be compatible. There are fish available that are suitable for beginners and will not cause undue problems in the future. They are generally hardy and will forgive some novice errors which are often to do with seawater quality.

What if the system is to include a reef? The same thing applies: the corals need to be compatible and not a negative for the future and also be hardy (in marine terms). Though it is not absolutely necessary, it’s best to place corals in first and allow them to settle for a while so that they have the best quality seawater without the contaminating influence of fish. In addition corals usually arrive on a rock and this rock has to be fitted into the reef. This could raise the need to move or even remove rocks and new fish would be further stressed by this action. There are corals that are suitable for the beginner and could very well be enough for the future as they display beauty and interest together and individually. On the basis that corals are strictly best in first what is available?

The best corals to consider are those that are generally termed as ‘soft’. These corals come in various forms and there are many types. They provide a lovely reef scene and many sway in the seawater currents and make a lovely picture. The size of the aquarium needs to be considered to ensure individual coral types are suitable and also how many different types are required. Corals have a low impact on seawater quality, far less than fish, so that is one potential problem less. They should be firmly placed so they don’t fall later and have plenty of room for expansion. Corals should not be in direct line with a powerhead output. Some of the corals mentioned can be trimmed (‘fragged’) if they become too large, producing a new coral.

The first coral type is the finger coral (properly known as Sinularia sp and Lobophytum sp). As the name suggests they usually have a main stem attached to a rock with branches above which in turn carry smaller branches which hold the polyps. This is not always the case though, some are low level. One of these low level types is Sinularia dura which is possibly the hardiest of all but still lovely.

The toadstool corals (properly called Sarcophyton sp) have a thick stalk crowned by a flat head covered in extended polyps. They are quite unique in appearance and interesting to include.

Mushroom corals (properly known as Rhodactis sp and Discosoma sp) are a little similar to the toadstools but much lower. They are attached to rockwork by a short stalk and have a circular head. The head is usually of a rough appearance but not always. They usually form groups.

Button polyps (properly known as Zoanthus sp) are a grouping of polyps that appear similar to flowers in a vase. The heads are much smaller than the previous corals. They can spread and are usually constrained by the size of the rock(s) they can colonise. They are an excellent addition to a reef.

That’s a good start for corals so what about fish? They need to be compatible with corals and each other. Before a few fish species are considered let’s look at damsel fish. These are small, active, hardy and colourful. Some, even occasional dealers, still suggest them to ‘run in’ a new aquarium – this is wrong, maturation fluid should be used if required. Very important, damsel fish are generally territorial and aggressive. If they are placed in an aquarium first they will see the aquarium as their territory and could harass or attack later additions even those bigger than themselves. This could lead to the later fish being afraid to come for food resulting in poor health or death. So avoid damsel fish. If one must be had, introduce it to the aquarium last so that other fish are settled and ensure the other fish are sturdy and not easily picked on.

The first fish in this short starter list is the firefish (properly known as Nemateleotris sp). At first sight this fish species appears delicate but they are reasonably hardy and are best kept as a pair. They could grow to about 3”. Probably the best known firefish is Nemateleotris magnifica.

Another interestingly shaped and coloured fish is the bicolour blenny (properly called Ecsenius bicolor). This can also grow to about 3”. It moves from rock to rock and mainly stays in view, and could stop at a particular point for a while.

Now for the gorgeous royal gramma ( properly called Gramma loreto). This fish is a little larger and could grow to near 4”. It is beautifully coloured and a definite plus.

A fish that most would recognise is the so called common clown (properly called Amphiprion ocellaris). These could grow to about 3”. This clownfish bears the colours that signal ‘marine’, it is very attractive. Two could be kept. These fish are being widely commercially and home bred. It’s reported that the aquarium bred ones are more hardy than the reef caught ones, so it’s a very good idea to obtain the aquarium bred type. On the wild reefs clownfish live with anemones but this should not be attempted by the beginner. Keeping an anemone is not as easy as might be thought as experience is required. Common clownfish – particularly the aquarium bred ones – should be quite happy without an anemone.

If the aquarium is ready for stocking that is all is operational and the biological filtration is ready, the suggested corals and fish (or some of them depending on the size of the aquarium) should give a colourful and interesting foundation. They are reasonably hardy and are able – within reason! – to tolerate small errors beginners are likely to make. If the aquarium is big enough further fish and/or corals can eventually be added after research has confirmed that they are fully compatible with existing stock.

There’s something missing from this text – pictures. If the aquarist types the proper name into a search engine then a whole host of choices will appear, including pictures and care.

The One That Went Missing

We moved address and I had to close my reef aquarium. It was a sad but necessary action. At the new address, once all the seemingly never ending jobs after a house move has occurred had been done, my thoughts turned to another reef aquarium. This one, the current one, is a little smaller because of space.

According to my notebook the aquarium was initially mature in October 2002 that is any unwanted ammonia/nitrite readings had gone. This was with an aquarium full of seawater and rocks, nothing else. I wanted a soft coral reef (as always) and a selection of corals went in. These were left to settle before any fish additions.

I always understock my aquariums and only considered three fish which needed to meet the criteria of being reasonably hardy and not over timid, also they would need to remain small. The selection was a Flame Angel (Centropyge loriculus), a Flashback as in the photo (Pseudochromis diadema), and a Fijian Blue Damsel (Chrysiptera tampou). Once the fish had been selected and given time to display any unwanted problems they went into their new home. This was in April 2003.

They were fine, no problems at all. They all fed really well and didn’t cause each other problems. After a while the Flame Angel became boss fish and the other two bickered with each other occasionally.

The whole reef continued in really good shape. The fish were in good health displaying excellent colour and no signs whatsoever of any problem. In time the Flashback became very rounded – he (she?) spent much time in amongst the rocks which I assumed was because tiny creatures were being caught and eaten. The Flame Angel did the same but to a lesser extent and the damsel mainly just cruised about in open water.

We all from time to time have some identifiable problem with an aquarium, in my case it has been with hardware – a powerhead became very noisy and had to be fixed, likewise with the protein skimmer motor. Not a big problem.

After three years, in March 2006 I noted that the Flashback had not appeared as usual when food was offered. The fish was often the first at the table even beating the damsel to the offering. Waiting and watching achieved nothing, the fish didn’t appear. I wasn’t particularly alarmed and the next day I expected the Flashback to appear as usual, particularly at feeding time, but the fish was nowhere to be seen. The fish, as were the other two, was in clearly good health. The only noticeable thing and different from the other two fish was the very rounded belly from the food available among the rocks.

Some fish have been known to jump though the Flashback is generally not one of these. However, as I run my reef with an open top I checked for the fish everywhere, on the floor all round the aquarium cabinet, everywhere that the fish could be on aquarium braces etc but found nothing. There is a weir for the seawater but nothing had gone over this, and it would be very difficult for anything to do so. I even checked on the top of the fluorescent tubes!

I continued to watch and hope for quite a few days but the fish didn’t appear. At this point I did ammonia and nitrite tests but these were normal at zero and remained so. There wasn’t any sign of a reef problem: all the corals were happy, extended and showing off their polyps.

So I wonder what happened. I have to admit that I haven’t any idea based on fact as there wasn’t any indication of anything amiss whatsoever, the fish was certainly in good health and mobile with no sign of age. It wasn’t a timid fish (they’re known to be the opposite generally). There’s certainly nothing in the aquarium that would predate on the fish. The only conclusion I can come to is that the fish paid the price for being greedy and getting well rounded, there certainly wasn’t any overfeeding by me but there’s quite a lot of live food in the rocks. Somehow, maybe, it got stuck in the rocks.

The Flame angel and the Fiji damsel continue in great health and colour having now spent eight years in the aquarium. I’ve not replaced the Flashback as the display is lovely as it is.

A Large Aquarium Re-Start

There are all sorts of aquarium sizes that are kept at home, though none as large as can be seen at a public aquarium as far as I know.

Successful small aquariums from the very small 10 gallons to the larger 50 gallons, fish only or reef, are very beautiful to look at as a whole, but their main impact is in the detail particularly with a reef. Even in a very small aquarium, provided it is a well aged system, there are growths of different algae, sometimes different corals popping up, existing corals spreading, miniature life such as tiny worms waving around looking for food and tiny shrimps foraging about particularly at night. At night small snails could appear then hide away again when dawn arrives. There’s often more.

With larger aquariums the impact is not just the beauty but the eye filling dimensions. I would guess that if asked a marine aquarist would normally advise that a larger aquarium would be on their shopping list ‘if only’. It cannot be denied that a fish only system with many fish and some of them larger species such as angels is a real spectacle. A properly designed and stocked reef system, well, that is truly something. It appears as if the reef has been sliced out of the wild and placed in the aquarium complete with life. It is true of course that any captive reef doesn’t have the diversity of Mother Nature’s own, but let’s not start nit picking. Again, close inspection should reveal all sorts of interesting items as in the previous paragraph but probably more so. Most viewers however wouldn’t be too concerned about small detail; the overall view would be the one to watch.

There is a large aquarium that is accepted as one of the best. It belongs to David Saxby and can certainly be described as large. Many marine aquarists are aware of it and have watched the video of the original aquarium, lovely as it was. Was? Yes, the aquarium has been stripped down and re-started so that the livestock could be altered. A new video has been produced that is very watchable and well made. There are some lovely fish to be seen, anthias and yellow tangs seems to be a favourite – watch out for the different coloured one. There’s also one of my favourite fish, the copperband butterfly.

As said the video is worth watching and is relaxing, so sit back and just enjoy. Here it is:

---

What Is An Invertebrate?

To avoid becoming a squishy heap on the ground humans have a skeleton. Quite a good invention really, not having a skeleton would cause quite a few difficult problems.

Humans aren’t alone with the possession of a skeleton of course; there are all sorts of life forms that have one too, how about the elephant or man’s best friend the dog as just two examples.

Skeletons are not essential to life however; there are creatures that don’t use one at all. As a non-scientist I can say that they use a different method to maintain their body shape, I’m not sure how a scientist would put it. For example a shrimp has a hard outer shell rather than an inner skeleton.

Vertebrates, those that have a skeleton, are vastly outnumbered in the world. It is estimated that vertebrates are around 3% of the life forms in the world. It follows that a massive 97% (I just had to demonstrate my mathematical abilities) are invertebrates.

There are land dwelling insects such as spiders and worms, examples of well known invertebrates. In the cold sea there are huge numbers of plankton, anemones, sponges etc. The warm seas contain many better known (to the marine aquarist) invertebrate species, including filter feeding worms, shrimps, corals and sometimes very large anemones. It is with some anemones of course that the representatives of the vertebrate/invertebrate world have combined forces to mutual advantage; these are the clown fish with their selected hosts. There are other examples of this life style.

Invertebrates are very adaptable as demonstrated by the discovery of volcanic activity deep in the sea well beyond the sun’s light. Scientists used to accept that life basically depends on the availability of light from the sun, an example of which is that plant life uses the sun’s light to photosynthesize and grow, and then the plant life is eaten by a herbivore from which energy is obtained. Herbivores are then the prey for carnivores. They all basically depend on the plants and the sun. This belief has been changed by the life found near this deep volcanic activity, including filter feeding worms, mollusks, bacteria and crabs which depend not on the sun’s light but on heat and chemicals.*

Anyway marine aquarists, or rather those who maintain a reef system, keep various types of invertebrate including shrimps, corals, sponges, anemones, filter feeding worms etc. These very interesting life forms only ask for a few things for success, including high quality seawater, for the majority of corals and some others sufficient light of the correct spectrum, space to grow and freedom from predation. It is usually important to place for example corals in a position where they receive sufficient seawater flow.

It is worthwhile noting that all marine aquariums, big or small, fish only or reef, depend on invertebrates for their health and life. The bio-filtration system, whether this is live rock or canister filters, contains bacteria that deal with the toxins ammonia and nitrite. Without these bacteria the life in the aquarium would die. With live rock, further bacteria should be able to deal with the sometimes troublesome nitrate.

Those aquarists who make use of natural live rock could discover that they have invertebrate life forms in their aquariums that they didn’t import themselves or at least not intentionally. Some such as filter feeding worms could be welcome. Others such as the Aiptasia anemone are not welcome. The Mantis shrimp is another, though in this case it is worth keeping but needs re-housing to an area where problems won’t arise.

Invertebrates provide the aquarist with a chance to create a living reef at home, be this large or small, though compared to Mother Nature’s creations all home reefs are miniscule. Nevertheless, a successful home reef is wonderful to see.

(* Reference: Marine Invertebrates. Martyn Haywood & Sue Wells)

---

Can You Imagine Them Yesterday? – Yesterday They Couldn’t Imagine Us

Wild coral reefs don’t think (if they could) in terms of ‘yesterday’ as we understand it. Yesterday could be a thousand years ago or more. This is the wild reef overall of course, not the multitudes of organisms that make it up. The ‘yesterdays’ in that case could be as ours.

We marine aquarists tend to think in terms of days, weeks and months. We wait for the bio-filter to ‘mature’. We watch as the captive reef settles and marvel at the incredible sights that Mother Nature created and we obtained. Slowly (in our terms) the captive reef changes and develops.

‘Yesterday’ is a direct literal word and also a suggestive one. Paul McCartney of the Beatles sang ‘Yesterday all my troubles seemed so far away’ and this could have been a literal yesterday or months or even years ago. In this case we’re talking of years, quite a few in fact, forty plus and more.

Marine aquarists then were a different bunch; they were generally patient and careful and had to be. The modern aquarist is but not in the same way. The grounding for this care and patience in bygone days was lack of knowledge.

The internet wasn’t even a possibility or an item of science fiction. Marine aquarium books, there weren’t any. It was word of mouth and hope. The hobby itself didn’t really exist, as to be a hobby as such needs a largish following. The early marine aquarists were really dedicated hopers, stumbling along from problem to problem. It was believed that clean salt water was the answer and as soon as any problem reared its ugly head seawater changes commenced, often to no avail. The seawater itself wasn’t as we know it, it was a very basic mixture of ingredients obtained from chemists and home mixed. All that were kept were a few fish and perhaps an invertebrate or two. Nothing seemed to last long, something clearly was wrong.

Then a Mr. Straughan (an Englishman I believe) came along. He also was concerned about seawater cleanliness and spent some time considering how this could be achieved without changing seawater quite so much. He recognized that there existed one item in the aquarium that would make a very good solids filter – the sand. Most aquariums of the time had coarse sand on the base. What he did was pump seawater down into the sand under a plate so that it flowed up again through the sand. The debris became trapped and the seawater was noticeably cleaner. The amount of seawater changing reduced.

The fish lived longer and Mr. Straughan was sure that the increased cleanliness was the answer. In a way he was correct, the seawater was cleaner but not only from debris – also from the toxics ammonia and nitrite. Bacteria had developed within the sand and were fed with oxygen laden seawater. Mr. Straughan as I understand it was never sure about the toxin reasoning but this was the case – he had created an under-gravel bio-filter. Who suggested the presence of bacteria I do not know, but it was correct of course.

It wasn’t long before the marine hobby started to grow now that such a barrier had been overcome. This was apparent because commercial under-gravel filters appeared so there had to be a market. Pet shops started to keep some colourful marine fish, often damsels, which really advertised themselves. Numbers of fresh water aquarists moved to the marine side.

It was at this point that I became involved, being one of those fresh water aquarists. I saw some damsels and.. well, the seed was sown.

The very earliest marine aquariums were glass held in place by angle iron (just think of the problems with salt water). Attempts were made to combat this with stainless steel. However, my aquariums were glass and silicone sealant thank goodness!

Those aquariums were successful for the most part, but fish only. Keep corals, don’t be silly, impossible! We should have known, it had been said earlier that keeping coral fish was impossible, at least for any length of time.

My fish only aquarium was decorated with a sand base (with an under-gravel filter) and dead bleached corals. How awful that sounds now. We used to put the dead coral skeletons in fresh water, perhaps with bleach in, to kill and remove any living or once living material so reducing the chance of pollution. After careful rinsing, into the aquarium it went. I thought it was so wonderful having these colourful fish and they seemed happy and healthy enough. Thank goodness I never suffered from the dreaded wipe-out when all fish died. This wasn’t from ammonia, nitrite or disease (though disease did claim a lot of fish) but something was obviously doing it – all fish wiped out in up to a week or so. It still isn’t known for sure what caused it at least to me; some argued it was algae causing toxicity (how?).

One day something magic happened – a protein skimmer came on the market. It was air driven and the bubbles travelled in the same direction as the flow of seawater, so contact time wasn’t brilliant. It worked though and the tank wipe-out became a thing of the past. So it seems dissolved organic matter could have had something to do with the wipe-out? Perhaps so.

Improvements continued in small ways, such as the under-gravel filter had its seawater flow reversed. In other words, instead of seawater being pumped down under the sand and then up through it, the seawater travelled down through the sand and then came up tubes. This lowered the under-gravel’s major problem which was the accumulation of detritus which could seriously reduce effectiveness because of less seawater flow, but it didn’t cure it.

Things moved on and gathered pace – as the marine hobby grew in popularity so more and more manufacturers recognized the potential market. Manufacturers are of course in competition so products became better. An example of this was (and is) the canister filter which had been in use in the freshwater world for many a year. This moved to marines and many bio-medias appeared, one of the best being sintered glass (this is the bio method I used, and still used until recently).

So here we are today. The hobby is at a point that would have made aquarists such as Mr. Straughan gasp in amazement. The fish we keep are so varied. Then the corals, what can be said? With a combination of both the captive reef is born.

In comparison to those early days we have a much easier life, even compared to when I began with marines. This is based on knowledge not necessarily in the grasp of aquarists but with manufacturers who are able to produce so much advanced equipment to maintain seawater quality. Lighting too, there are many choices of bulb or fluorescent tube tailored for corals, whose light requirements in those early days were unknown. Protein skimmers are mainly no longer air driven but use electricity, with seawater flowing through clouds of tiny bubbles achieving a high contact time. Then all the rest of the equipment available such as calcium reactors, aquarists don’t even have to top up the seawater if they don’t want to, they can use automation. Tap water isn’t good enough; we can super filter it with a reverse osmosis unit!

So when that beautiful captive reef is watched what a foundation it is built on. We have a great deal to thank those early pioneer aquarists for. The stress we modern aquarists feel from time to time really shrinks in comparison to the efforts, stress and frustration that must have existed then.

---

Things Change

Pretty obvious really! The weather is an example. But no, we’re concerned with marine aquariums of course.

In a fish only aquarium the changes are usually, strangely enough, to do with fish. New additions, growth, the cave/hole they live in and the like. In a reef system more changes are often noticeable.

On the wild reef changes occur slowly for the most part, though things could happen quickly. If a storm comes along then coral formation could change as corals are broken. Unfortunately change can also happen quickly (in terms of the life of the reef) caused by man-made pollution and interference. Normal reef changes are when one coral slowly dominates another in a long drawn out battle for space, or coral colonies spread over new areas.

So change is quite natural. In the aquarium changes could be unnatural, that is caused by the aquarist. An example is the cutting of corals because of growth. When corals grow they could shadow or at least reduce the light available for others and in addition the seawater flow could be altered, meaning that some corals do not receive the flow they require. So the aquarist cuts the corals to maintain the balance of light and/or flow. This is a quite drastic change that doesn’t occur in the wild of course. Overshadowing will occur to some extent though. Hopefully the aquarist having cut corals will ‘frag’ them so that additional good comes from the exercise.

Other changes can occur and this unfortunately includes coral failure. Nowadays with the greater amount of knowledge available failure in this area should be much reduced. However, failure can occur in more than the usual way, the usual way being that a coral is just not happy, closes and shrinks away quite rapidly.

In my soft coral reef there is a colony of green star polyps, which are sometimes called star polyps or daisy polyps. The proper name is Pachyclavularia purpurea (some call it Clavularia viridis but this is incorrect)*. Anyway, the thing is that this colony arrived six years ago on a rock which was completely covered. The rock would be generally about 6 inches across at the base and about 4 inches high. After a while the coral spread onto a neighbouring rock and completely covered that as well. There wasn’t anywhere else for it to go so it stopped spreading.

For a long while it just came out at ‘dawn’ and went in at ‘dusk’. It was perfectly healthy and also completely at home, happy with the lighting and seawater currents. It was attractive and added to the many colours of the display.

Eventually I noted that it was beginning to climb onto itself that is it had nowhere to go except to cover itself. So the mat was spreading and new polyps were opening on top of the original.

I was quite concerned about this as I thought first of all that the lower layer could lose adhesion – but it didn’t. The spread across a lower layer continued for a long while, years in fact and eventually the colony was higher than it had been originally because of the layering. I was pleased in a way as the shape of the colony had altered; it no longer followed the shape of the rock but had formed mounds and spires plus some flatter surfaces, making it more interesting.

This situation continued until I noticed that some of the colony, a small area only, didn’t have any extended polyps. Sometimes the colony had not expanded for a whole day or so on previous occasions, therefore I wasn’t concerned.

However, the polyp areas that failed to expand extended in area. Eventually I noticed a bare area of rock down near the base. This area extended until very nearly all of the rock was bare. Some of the remaining un-layered matt containing polyps was removed and placed elsewhere in the aquarium and this is opening normally, appearing to be beginning to form a new colony.

Apart from one area on the adjacent rock that was colonized there wasn’t anything left. The reduction and loss happened over about a period of two months, which isn’t very long.

It isn’t all bad news though. I’ve recently noticed that a few odd polyps have appeared on the rock and hopefully these will lead to a re-colonization. If this occurs then I’ll recover the original colony and have an additional transplanted one.

So why did this occur? All other corals are fine, expanded with proper polyp extension. It follows that seawater quality and lighting are also as they should be.

I reckon my original fear that the original matt could lose adhesion was not the reason for the die-back. Adhesion loss could of course have occurred but the colony remained in place.

It seems to me that as the colony for the most part actually disappeared then it must have ‘dissolved’, or rotted away. This could have started with the covered lower layers rotting, which would have caused the top layer to become affected.

What I have to do now is wait and continue observing the polyps that remain, both the two small colonies and the separate polyps. Hopefully the original colony will grow back to full size.

If full size is achieved then perhaps the colony will eventually begin to overgrow itself. This would presumably mean the colony will eventually fail again. The possible way out of this is to put a bare rock alongside the re-generated colony which can be grown over. This can be placed elsewhere in the reef or given away.

As in the wild changes occur with the captive reef. It all makes the hobby so interesting, don’t you think?

The photos (taken by me so not of professional standard!) show the area where the original colony existed alongside the rock that was colonized, where some of the coral remains. The other photo, taken closer in, shows the polyps that have appeared that give me hope that a new colony will re-generate.

(*Reference: Aquarium Corals. Eric H. Borneham)

---

Public Aquariums

Most aquarists like to visit a public aquarium from time to time and once there are drawn to the marine areas. Usually the displays are excellent but not always, even the professionals can make mistakes or have mishaps.

My local public aquarium made a very basic mistake which was pointed out to them. In a large reef display they put a large number of damsel fish which looked very impressive at first. I say ‘at first’ because the numbers diminished quite rapidly. This was because they also introduced two rather large lionfish. Now, we all know what lionfish are likely to have for lunch don’t we. They did! Before all the small fish disappeared the lionfish were removed and now have their own smaller display aquarium.

Anyway, public aquariums are the place to see some excellent display aquariums in which creatures too large for a home system are kept. In addition there are often some reef systems on display which usually draw quite a few ‘oohs’.

The London public aquarium has various displays and the attached short video is one of them. At the beginning of the video is a water motion section, the movement presumably generated by some hefty timed pumps. Don’t worry about the colour, the video changes quickly.

---

Next Page »